We use cookies to personalize content, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. For information on how to change your cookie settings, please see our Privacy policy. Otherwise, if you agree to our use of cookies, please continue to use our website.

Jimmy Wales: Google is secret, proprietary, closed. Search should be open.

In Friday's WallStrip, there's an intersting interview with Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales. For me, the key bit comes about 80% of the way in (4:11), where Jimmy comments on Google. Emphasis mine:
Lindsay Campbell: What's wrong with Google, and how will Wikia's search be different? Jimmy Wales: I think the main thing that is wrong with Google is that everything is secret, proprietary, closed... I'm a big believer in openness and transparency, ah, open source software, open protocols, and I think search should be open as well. Campbell: How would that work? Functionally...? Wales: Well, we haven't invented it yet.
I've been thinking about Google's opacity a good deal recently, and have a medium-sized post on this topic coming out Tuesday on Search Engine Land. In Tuesday's post, I suggest Google is remarkably opaque towards their advertisers. Google obfuscates click cost info (providing costs only in aggregate, rather than click-level reporting), obfuscates ad ranking (quality score), and obfuscates ad matching (broad match), etc. I also suggest that if Google embraced extreme transparency -- if they could overcome the substantial associated business risk -- Google would enjoy (even more) explosive growth and (even more) market dominance. While I'm bearish on Wikia, I think Wales is totally right on the money with his comments on Google's secrecy. Prediction: Google's lack of transparency becomes a significant issue in late '07 / early '08.
Join the Discussion