We use cookies to personalize content, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. For information on how to change your cookie settings, please see our Privacy policy. Otherwise, if you agree to our use of cookies, please continue to use our website.

Paid Search Wisdom Distilled From Email "Hot Stock Tip" Spam

pretty shell

I received a curious piece of spam this week. It merits comment as it illustrates a critical concept in direct marketing: list-offer-package. The L-O-P concept also applies to running paid search marketing effectively.

Here's the spam:

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:24 AM
Subject: Mar'ket wacth

Now -you can see what we " were saying.

Fir,m: An gs trom Mico syste ms
Buy as: amgs.ob
Strongly R ec ommend
Rece"nt: .4_0
Vloume: 331,48-5

Atfer the gerat news last week, volumed traded hit 331,485.

Mroe great things to come, t,he cli_ent base is growing and production is boimong A-G,MS is the one to watch.

Stlil a low investment thresh.ol"d, purchase Ang strom in the morning on Teusday.

OK, this is clearly a pump-and-dump stock scam for a penny stock, AGMS.OB. But to defeat Bayesian spam filters, Gsemlinger ran the email through some sort of obfuscation filter, which sometimes tossed in extraneous punctuation (Rece"nt) and sometimes permuted some letters (stlil, Teusday, gerat, boimong).

You can still make sense of the email, but it reads as if it was composed by a moron. Seriously, who in their right mind would take stock investment tips from anyone who writes that poorly?

Hold a sec. Let's assume that SpamBoy Gsemlinger isn't stupid. Let's examine his marketing strategy.

Gsemlinger consciously degraded his response rate (the typos make humans less likely to act on his hot stock tip) in order to increase his list size (the typos make Bayesian filters more likely to let the message pass).

Why?

Why not instead send a beautifully composed long email, effusively and compellingly touting Angstrom MicroSystems, the wonder stock?

Perhaps Gsemlinger knows the List-Offer-Package rule, or L-O-P. Offer trumps Package, and List trumps Offer. It is takes less effort to win by growing the universe than by growing the response rate.

What do I mean by L-O-P? In direct marketing in general and in paid search in specific, who you are talking to (List) matters more than the details of what you are selling (Offer), and how you present your offering (Package) is the least important factor.

This doesn't mean direct response creative and copy aren't important; they certainly are. But creative and copy are less important than the offer itself, than what you are selling -- the price, quality, and uniqueness of your merchandise; your service, guarantee, support, and shipping policies, etc. And more important than that is the quantity (sheer numbers) and quality (relevance, targeting, prior purchase history) of the prospect universe you're addressing.

George Michie hits the nail on the head when he discusses how paid search analysts should spend their time to get maximum benefit.

Truly horrible PPC copy can hurt you, yes, but there's small incremental sales benefit going from "decent" copy to "great" copy (low single digit response lifts, if that).

Truly horrible PPC landing pages can hurt you, true, but the incremental benefit between "decent" and "great" landing pages is small (typically single digit response lifts, if changes are just design and layout).

By all means work on copy and landing pages, particularly if they're sub-par. But place your emphasis on the size and quality of your marketing universe. It is far far easier to grow your List by 10% or 20% (perhaps even 50%). If you can keep the quality up, increasing the number of individuals to whom you're marketing increases your sales proportionally, and your profits hyperproportionally. Dollar for dollar and hour for hour, increasing the number of quality prospects with whom you're speaking is the most cost-effective and time-effective marketing lever you can pull.

Gsemlinger faced an either/or tradeoff, where he opted to buy List (circ) at the cost of Package (response).

Happily, in paid search, we don't need to degrade our ads to get more volume. In PPC, getting more qualified traffic translates to compulsively-extensive keyword lists, judicious use of match types, and razor-sharp economic-based statistical bidding algorithms.

Keywords, bids, and matchtypes -- those are the big levers of paid search. To get your PPC programs generating maximum profit, focus there first.

Or as our friend Gsemlinger would advise: Keywodrs, bids, and match"types -- those ar-e the big levesr of pa,id serach. To get your PP-C program,s genertaing maximu.m profit, focus tehre first.

Join the Discussion